Buen Vivir - Neue Töne aus Lateinamerika mit Grupo Sal und Alberto Acosta

Wo:

In this post we will upload all abstracts- summaries of the presentations and descriptions from the participating collectives for your best preparation.

  1. Participant groups are required to present briefly (max 10 minutes), as input during showcases, some case studies- best practices from each country on the specific issues addressed (1. producer- consumer networks and cooperatives; 2. cooperative working spaces; 3. barter exchange networks, complementary currencies and time banks; 4. eco-communities and self-resilient initiatives).
  2. Speakers are required to send prior to the seminar extended abstracts (1-2 pages in word format) of their presentation (or description of their collective), a Reader (including bibliography, published articles and other useful material) on their subject and a short bio (in word format) of their own. We will collect also the Powerpoints during the seminar and any other material you seem fit. All presentations will be videotaped and all the material gathered will be freely available through GROWL website.
  3. Participant Trainees (potential GROWL trainers) that in Thessaloniki will attend their second GROWL seminar and wish to present their assignment in order to get certification, please let us know beforehand and prepare a 10-15 minutes presentation of your exercise in order to present it during the TTT module at the end of the seminar. Also please send us before the start of the seminar a brief summary of your assignment. 
Wo:

If you follow this line (also figuratively speaking), the production and consumption of a given good is, for a start, in your responsibility and naturally limited. There is no need to educate people or tell them what to do. If you provide them with moments of leisure and self-reflection (e.g. by some basic income) their footprints will be small and agree with nature.

 

The GAP CONSUMPTION was dominated by the idea of educating people. But this won’t work in the end. People don’t like being treated as objects. And self-disciplinary measures  are not very appealing. I’d rather rouse the natural senses in every human being. Senses buried alive in most people of developed countries. You know, relying on your senses is more pleasant than castigating yourself.

 

Of course, in a second run, if a people’s majority of a nation  agrees on things they don’t need, they can administrate regulatory restrictions. If they have agreed on subsistence and sufficiency beforehand. Not feeling in competition with other nations.

 

At any rate, the successful way to degrowth goes with fun and not with discipline.

Wo:

I wrote this text for the GROWL project, but I think it can also serve other events.

Why?

As in our society work and spaces gets more and more divided, also young people get more and more marginalised and been looked at in institutions. Public space, where it is not already sold or been built on, is serving mainly the needs of consuming society, not the needs from young people to learn in their neighbouthood environment from an age mixed group, playing, exploring or transforming it, yet to say: Being an important member who participates.

Young people are objects which need to be pedagogically observed and trained, and therefore to be brought mainly by their parents from one place to the next, from kindergarden to courses from playground to school.

The ways between the spots are dangerours, mainly because of cars, secondly because of anonymity, bad thought architecture and people with problems.

Therefore, slowly young people disappear from our "world" as we see it everyday. Many people do not even have daily contact to under 18s. The public space and city planning processes are left to our economy and people who are able to serve this economy, mainly people between 20 and 45 years.

And as it often, the less contact you have to a certain group of society, the more prejudices come up around them. Children are naughty, tyrannies and never want to sleep. We all know this.

Therefore also in so called alternative circles people under 18 are mostly not warmly welcome. For concentrated working you really have to be under adults, everybody knows this as well. Little efforts are being made to include younger people in our daily struggles.

And so also projects and the work which is produced in the alternative scene is not so appealing to young people. More appealing seems consumerist society, where everything is well thought and designed for their well-studied "needs".

As we are aiming for a degrowth society, we have urgently to change something.

We have to shift the focus more on the needs of the younger generation and welcome them inside our circles, more, we have to appreciate their inputs, since their way of thinking is much less schooled, trained and blurred than our senses and ways of thinking are already.

If we want to build up a degrowth society we have not just to listen to their ideas, but also remember, that these young people are the ones who are going to deal with our left overs from growth societies in a couple of years and we depend on the decision they will do when they have our age!

So they have to be mentally strong, with the capazity to for a brought way of thinking and also practically skilled people and we should start now to include them in our way of thinking and doing, otherwise the will go the seemingly more appealing way which growth society offers them now, but at the same time not giving them big skills to transit to a more able, more just, more pluralistic, more democratic, more ecological and what ever degrowth society.

So lets start with the inclusion in our heads. Children are not a burden to our courses, but a part of society, which needs respect, love and participation.

For more practical aspects we started to put up a list, where you can orientate to have a proper child inclusion at your courses. Of course this is open to discuss and changes.

Invitation:

Young people in general go more for pictures than for text. Make an own invitation to them, with some degrowth appealing style. Never forget, there are thousands of well-paid designers at the next corner, trying to get their attention for the newest gadget or entertainment park to compete with. Getting an own invitation with some nice picture or even a postcard, they might be able to send to some friends from the course, is much cooler, than just being brought by the parents to a random meeting where grown ups sit for 5 days in circles and discuss "important" things, meaningless to them and where they are just been seen as additional stress.

Make clear, that the GROWL course is interesting, also for young people, and that they are more than welcome.

Write a special invitation to parents you know to be interested in degrowth. Many parents have been politically active and left it aside, due to dificulties of including the children in political struggles. But living degrowth means also including families, where values are much more transported than in institutitions or the best political education project. ( if we like it or not...)

Make especially visible, that children are welcome on the invitation and the registration formular. If there is nothing written, people assume, the event is without children. Many parents don't even ask for childcare, because they assume, there is none.

More kids on spot means normally less work for the adults.

Food: 

Make sure, that there is some food, which is not spicy. Best is kind of pure food. Pure noodles, pure carrots and so on, like a buffet, where they can pick on their own.

Leave some snacks and fruit always on the spot, so that children can serve themselves during day. Same goes for drinks. If dinner is very late, make sure, there is a possibility for them eating a bit earlier, especially younger children have problems to wait very long.

Cooking is a very inclusive work. Also small children can already participate. Check with the parents, if they are ok, that the child uses a knife. For children this is not a problem, yet for some parents. They can also pick and wash veggies and fruits, make bread and love to make cake. Ask them what the want to cook, they might have creative ideas!

Introduce them to not so well known ways of cooking like rocket stove, solar cooker etc., as well as picking herbs or mushrooms with them, if you are familiar with. They will love it!

Party:

Young people like to party like everybody! Party doesn't necessarily mean drunk people on drugs, smoking in dark corners listening to very loud german house music and smashing bottles. ( even if this might be fun:P)

Make sure, that the parties on your courses have a more convivial style. Circle dances, jam sessions, singing together, playing theatre,  painting, group games, bon fire, everything is very inclusive also for young people. If the parties start earlier than midnight the younger ones might be still awake and able to participate.

If the party is not at seminar place make sure, there is a safe place to sleep for them at the party, so that their parents might stay a bit longer.

Program:

It depends very much on the age. It is good to have an extra space and an extra person who is up to do a certain kind of program with the kids, while the grown ups are discussing "important" things, meaningless...and so on.

Activities could be:

Indoor:

- upcycling

- basteln with trash or nature materials

- singing, music together

- helping to cook

- painting

- setting up decoration for the space

- developing a theatre piece for evening surprise for the adults

- books, especially those which open debates related to topics the grown ups are discussing

- helping with daily tasks on the seminar spot

- helping each other, especially the older looking for the smaller ones

Outdoor:

- group games

- juggling

- ball games

- picking herbs, fruits, veggies

- exploring the spot

- building cardboard houses

There are tons of good books on both, inside and outside activities. Most important is to state, that it is not a child care on side, but directly contributing to the course itself. Children want to contribute, even the smallest. Give them "real" tasks, not just some unnessary stuff.

Don't overload the children with prefabricated toys, yet it is nice to have some stuff there. Books, some little toys, balls, juggling stuff, tissues for dressing and building "caves" and material for basteln. Think about toys which have a more colaborate character, like train lines you can stick together.

If the kids are older, you can also think about joining debates at a certain point to get the ideas of the younger ones in it. You can plan the course in a more convivial and practical way, so that sitting in a circle and working very quietly just makes a part of it and the rest is more open to participate also for the younger ones. Painting together, theatre, practical work, modelling, excursions, are very inclusive formats for all ages and enabling also the younger ones to pick up new skills. Ask children, if they want to contribute to the program in anyway. Open Space is therefore a good method.

Make sure, that the children are part of the morning circle and can express their thoughts and needs. You can also make an extra Child Plenary at the end of the afternoon. Especially younger ones can speak more easily about the day, than the day before. Let them rather draw than talk too much. If they can just concentrate for 5 minutes, leave it there. More important is that there is a space where they can express, than a very elaborate thing.

Make the effort and try at least to "translate" some of the theoretic debates from the course to the children, with pictures, easy language, playing. This is also a good exercise for talking to non academic people from "normal public"

Having an introduction on "What is degrowth" in the content modul, specially designed for kids, can be a good exercise for everybody, since many work with younger people or people not so familiar with degrowth.

Who cares?

This again depends very much on the age. Make sure, that you know at least 1 week beforehand all ages and special things about the children. If they are older, it might be unnessary to have a special care person. Being left alone and develop games with other children in an age mixed group is one of the biggest cultural losses we have at these days in our culture. Children are always cared and watched.

So if atmosphere is good, make sure, that the get some rules about the spot, where to go and where not, when to come back ( make sure it is very few  and understandable rules, than normally they will follow it), and leave them on their own.

If there is somebody on the spot, cooking or doing other practical work, ask if this person is up to invite the kids for help.

If they are smaller, you might need a care taking person or 2 ( more convivial)

Don't leave it to the seminar group or the parents alone, since they normally don't want to miss the course.

You can ask there for additional support, but have at least one reliable person, agreeing the main ideas of this text, to take care and look for a welcoming environment.

In general most parts of the courses should be designed to be together and not apart. So than everybody interacts, despite from age, and everybody cares for everybody, despite from age.

Language might be problematic, but more for the adult than the child. Children until 10-12 years normally pick up quickly the language and don't bother about language issues.

Rooms

Make sure, there is a room or outside spot, where the kids can be very loud and naughty, while the adults ( or other children!) want to concentrate. The more space they have to move, the less naughty they get. Nature always helps with conflicts.

Make sure rooms and facilities are barrierfree, and children can move autonomously. Asking all day for help is enerving for both young and older people. Make sure, the toilet is acessible and check if there are pots.

Explain how compost toilet works if they don't know it. Normally they love it. Maybe you can build a children compost toilet during the course.

Having a calm sleeping place especially for parents with smaller children might be beneficial for all.Make sure, there is a place to rest during the day near the seminar, for smaller children.

Hygiene

Since children come from different places and there are 30-60 people on each course, be very careful with hygiene, especially in places where is little water. Make sure, they wash the hands regulary, especially before eating. Talk with them about hygiene matters and why it is senseful to be more careful than in the allday life at home. Make sure, water to wash hands is acessible to them at any time.

Look beforehand numbers from pediatrics in the region, just for the case.

Have an emergency set at the seminar.

Wo:
FIRST GAP SESSION:
    
stirring paper presentation:
    
lifelong learning of children and adults: not just school: many people/studies look at school: we want to get out of this: there is always learning in children: in consumption, in tv, in interaction, in play, everywhere and at every time...
childhood in the degrowth and other movements often neglected: ex. human blockades by children: children will be exposed to what we do now: needed in the conference, child-unfriendly environments: education of adults well-recognized but may be too late: some things you cannot learn at adult state: learning group and gardening group do not mention children: applause!
back to stirring paper: childhood has changed: children have been more embedded: nowadays children like adults put into schedules: islands without interaction: How has childhood been before..?
on the other hand: children like and learn experiences: in DG society CH should be enabled to make experiences: 
    
Negative facts due to modern society: bad motor abilities: concentration difficulties in schools: no first-hand experience with/of nature: teachers show how nature is: abstraction from the very beginning
Four lines from stirring paper:
1. town-planning interventions: free movement + security + participation
2. social dimension: image of children, etc.
3. economic interventions: work time, consumption
4. pedagogical interventions:
Summary from BCN mere collection of what is known since years
    
yesterday's presentation: degrowth is not less of the same: doing things differently: a metamorphosis 
Group Phase! Splitting:
    
Presi:
    
I: more general talk: image of childhood: we need a new comprehension of childhood: get rid of "childhood" and "children"
II: up in trees: why aren't young people here (at degrowth)?
III: evolutionary basic needs of children and how to satisfy them?
VI: alle Kraft für kindheitsgerechte Entwicklung (that's degrowth)
V: feeling of being needed: society where they are needed and participate: 
VI: laws and scientific studies to put things in to practice: right to play in UN children rights: not translated into German.
… several more to be put on a list tomorrow ...
GAP II:
    
Introduction round of new members: 
    
how to organize?: focus on three most important things: use the categories of the stirring paper
putting all the topics on the blackboard 
we are discussing too much about how to organize our discussion and selection of topics
10 point voting system of (I don't know how many) "proposals": groups of topic are organized: some proposals for action emerge: 
    
Again: Why are there no children under 18?: not well communicated + not interesting: democracy and participation, rights and school system would be interesting for them
6 topic dimensions:
    
1. economic
2. social
3. urban
4. pedagogical intervention
5. political
6. others
Topics proposed for group work:
    
- schools & learning
- childhood/concept
- urban space
- anthropologically founded needs of children
- action & strategies (work on proposed actions, overlap with other groups is fine/intended)
- economy & work
- feedback work & presentation
GAP III:
"Kleine Anfrage stellen" for the translation of the "right to play"
Put the article of UN human right convention again in the center of the attention: Nachtrag: notice that there were also some critical voices concerning the article
Childhood today = legal and social discrimination:
Wo:
Good morning, Edith here, today is Friday.  I think we became a bit "bogged down" in detail yesterday, but sometimes you have to go back to go forward.  One of our group became very upset by this.  Like many young people she is desperate to flee from the damaging world her elders have created, and find a completely different way of life. She is a "Fluechtling" - like all our children.  We do not see the most unhappy ones who need "Sorgenfressers" in every room, as we in the Degrowth movement do not mix with the most badly damaged members of society unless we work as teachers, doctors, lawyers, social workers, etc.
When this young woman described the society she needed and wanted, it sounded like a plea for a return to the Stone Age - exactly as Jean Jacques Rousseau pleaded in the 18th century.  Rousseau accepted this was impossible, but he thought "Progress" could be made less unpleasant and damaging by the Social Contract.  We must now admit that the Social Contract has failed, and worse still, as Rousseau predicted, Man is plundering Nature and destroying it.
As it happens, the exellent Stirring Paper starts out with a plea for Article 31 (1) of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989 (UNCRC) to be brought centre stage.  This Article protects the need of children for "Autonomous Exploration".  Yet the man-made world around children makes them prisoners, because it is hostile and dangerous due to industrialisation.  So the Article is failing, because the whole Environment for children is a failure.  It is also a failure for many animal and plant species, which are becoming extinct or at least endangered.
One of our group mentioned that the needs of human babies have not changed for thousands of years - so here again we have a plea for a return to the Stone Age, at last in some respects.  We know that nutritionists have been saying the Stone Age diet is the best one for humans for decades.  There is an increasing focus on the Hunter Gatherer form of humanity.  We also see this in popular culture, with rock groups like the Queens of the Stone Age - so the concept of the Stone Age is immensely attractive to all kinds of people in society.  In England, an exhibition about the Neanderthals at the Natural History Museum has been fantastically popular, surprising the organisers.  Etc.
I propose that on this last day, we focus on this idea of a "Return to the Stone Age", in relation to Childhood, because we have got bogged down in attempts to alter the present system.  The pioneers of Ecology, like Buckminster Fuller, have found that this cannot work.  I personally have been very shocked to see the extent to which women still want to join the world of work on an equal basis with men.  On the contrary, men should be wanting to leave the world of work and rejoin the more convivial world of the neighbourhood from which they have been excluded by industrial society.  Of course you cannot imprison men in childcare and other domestic matters.  But their spirit of adventure finds greater freedom in a Stone Age society than in the modern factory or office.  Rousseau was criticised in the 18th century for saying that women must look after their own children - but some wealthy women thanked him, because up to then, they had been forced to leave their children with foster mothers.  Women should be more grateful for the chance to stay at home with their children - there is nothing better than the company of contented children, they are a constant delight.
Working class men have become marginalised, enslaved and disenfranchised  more than any other group in today's world - in the developing world as well.  They are reacting with fury - and violence.  
    
Good morning, Edith here, today is Thursday the second day and I have been asked by the authors of the Stirring Paper, Christiane and Silvia, if today we can focus on the contents of this paper, and make our further Proposals around the main topics of the paper.  I think this is a good idea - it is a very well-ordered paper which covers everything.  Silvia and Christiane are the perfect team - Christiane provides a sensible, legal foundation and Silvia provides the fresh way of looking at things which is so important for all topics, not just Childhood.  I have been looking at the Law and it is extremely radical, and really agrees with us - but it is too slow and does not have the spark that lights the fire.  
Brillian minutes - thank you Sven.  Two more Proposals got added because I put mine in, on Inheritance, and Silvia expanded hers into two in a humorous way which should make people laugh.  
Hallo, Edith AGAIN.  Thanks for a very interesting first session.  Some of you had to leave because we ran late.  I just want to inform everyone that in the end we had to present our 8 Proposals, in writing, at the end of the session.  The Men in Black (Matthias and the Photographer) arrived with cameras and told us what to do (very nicely).  They went away to give us time - so some of us wrote out the 8 Proposals chosen on pieces of coloured card, and stuck them on the Poster.  This will be photographed tomorrow, for projection onto a screen, and given back to us by the start of tomorrow's session at 5.30.  
Sorry to the Presenter (Marinka) - but Matthias knows what he is doing.  He said it is much better for the other GAP participants to see as well as hear the Proposals.  If the Presenter (Marinka) would rather one of the people who ended up writing the Proposals on cards presented them just for tomorrow, that's fine - that means it is Silvia or Jens, and Silvia was not there for some of them so basically I think it has to be Jens!   
Hallo, Edith here - thank you for this article Silvia.  My German is not very good - but I understood the reference to Ivan Ilich's "Deschooling Society" - a very famous book, and there is sure to be an article in Wiki about him and the book for all those who understand English better than German.  
Edith
Good article unfortunately just in German about  Schooleducation and degrowth
You can read it, as a base for discussion in our GAP Process.
(Appeared first in "Unerzogen" Magazine, which is also in German but has a lot of interesting topics: http://www.unerzogen-magazin.de/)
Also it would be great if you could bring books, media and other stuff, you got inspired by or think it is valuable to discuss during our GAP,
Dont hesitate to post already links or ideas around the GAP topic here!
See you 
Silvia
Interesting TED-Talk " How school kills kreativity" by Ken Robinson:
Hallo All - I am Edith, I am the Facilitator for the moment (am happy to be replaced once the Conference starts).
Can I urge everyone to read the paper posted on the right ("Children and Degrowth") by Christiane and Silvia?  It is excellent, and provides the perfect - and very "holistic" - framework for disussion over the 3 days.  
I have summarised the Paper in 3 sections for my own use as Facilitator - there is no need to adhere to my summary, and in any case Christiane and Silvia may not like how I have used their work!
Section 1:  AUTONOMOUS EXPLORATION and EXPERIENTAL LEARNING
Please bring any personal memories from your own childhood and that of your parents, grandparents, etc., about how much freedom to roam and play children once had in your region of the world.  Also any observations you have made whilst travelling, or working abroad, or via photos, art, literature, songs, etc.
KEY WORD:  ROAM - Please bring ideas connected with this word in other cultures and languages (e.g. nomads, hunter gatherers, etc.)
Section 2:  TOWN PLANNING + SOCIAL INTERVENTION+  ECONOMIC INTERVENTION
These topics follow on from the first, because it cannot happen without these "Engineering" topics.  In English we often talk about Social Engineering and Economic Engineering - for an example of the latter see this paper from the FAO about Fisheries:
Engineering is a great and very old skill, providing useful and beautiful structures that last for centuries.  Do the social and economic and town planning changes imposed by the Consumer Society merit the term "Engineering".  Should we move towards real Engineering for Human Society (not forgetting other species)?  What would this require?  (See the Paper for suggestions.)
KEY WORD:  ENGINEER.  What does it mean, round the world, and in history?  Do people now laugh when an engineer says "Trust me, I am an Engineer!).  Should Engineers always obey orders?
Section 3:  PEDAGOGIC INTERVENTION
Again, has there been a wrong kind of "Engineering" here?  How can we "engineer" the restoration of lost freedoms and not be too dictatorial - i.e. still respecting Freedom of Belief, Thought & Expression, Assembly & Association, and Founding a Family (Articles 9 - 12 of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights).  The right (or freedom) to marry and found a family (Article 12) is rarely mentioned.  Why?
KEY WORDS:  FREEDOM + MYTH
What does Freedom mean for children?  Is it a Myth, for adults as well?  Do the great Myths and Legends of previous civilisations tell us anything about the desire for Freedom and the dangers of haing too much?  Why do children no longer know the Myths of their nation and other nations by heart?  In Victorian times, Myths from the Far East and the Near East were known to all British children and probably most European ones too.  What is the word for Myth in Chinese, Arabic, Russian, French, etc.?  Will modern societes leave behind any valid Myths of their own (Batman, Spiderman, Manga, Frozen, etc.) - or are they "ersatz" media fabrications? 
 

Trailer "Buen Vivir - Neue Töne aus Lateinamerika mit Grupo Sal und Alberto Acosta"

Media Folder

Eintrittskarte * "Buen Vivir" * Witzenhausen

Eintrittskarte ermäßigt * "Buen Vivir" * Witzenhausen