These notes were on a reflection round on Saturday morning, about the 2nd day of the course. Feel free to add anything that you find is missing.
| Plus: - very good input - concrete - Pro-action café worked well, it was fast and fluid, despite the tiredness at the end of the day - Replicated a process, even if only giving a taste, that one can repeat in other context, to come from the information, to the action proposal. | Minus: - too less interaction - too long - open space too short, does not allow to really enter discussions |
| Proposals: - mix the program more (e.g. farm work on each morning, instead the full Saturday) - have buffer zones in the program for flexibility on it (e.g. allow discussions on certain topics to go deeper) - give more space to the open space - bring the topics of the morning to the open space in the afternoon, to link and deepen these topics in relation to degrowth - more work on synthesis, trying to present the things we learned (as we did with the sources on Thursday) | Requests (for needs to be satisfied by the sources of the group): - to keep up the good group dynamics and role of the "bitch" (boy in total control of himself) - this role (time keeping, organising energizers, etc.) is very important and should be taken seriously by all course organisers - to have spaces for reflection every evening - collect and work on documentation |
- 735 reads