![Your profile picture](https://co-munity.net/sites/co-munity.net/files/styles/oa_medium_thumbnail/public/DG_icon_no_thread_128px_982.png?itok=hcA1-iDu)
Results from Barcelona 2010 on the topic
Consumption
The following are the results of the GAP at the Degrowth Conference 2010 in Barcelona that are particularly relevant for this working group.
The presents the complete results of those Barcelona working groups with some relations the current one.
Working Groups from 2010 GAP in Barcelona with some connections:
Reduction of natural resource exploitation
Political proposals
Global extractive moratoria on areas with high biodiversity and ethnographic value
Internalization and transparency of mining real (and long term) costs
Binding capacity for local communities in deciding about mining projects. Full information, a proper process and respecting national and international environmental protection norms
To create funds for financing independent researches on mining
To promote companies international accountability (campaining in countries of origin)
Research questions
How could we enforce a national cap on fossil fuels and other non-renewable resources while maintaining fair access?
How to tax advertising for discouraging resource consumption? With which criteria?
Which could be the results of an international found for compensating socio-environmental impacts?
Also disagreement points
Basic income and income ceiling
Basic income for all
Research Themes/Questions:
Comparisons between BI and a negative income tax plus a social welfare state to inform public opinion. That is, not only from a monetary-based approach, but also from a moral perspective.
Will economic degrowth provide sufficient means to finance a BI institution in the long-run?
Can a BI institution be a viable and fruitful alternative to development aid?
How has human psychology, values, and moral ideas played a role in preventing the application of a BI system in the past? What psychological insights can be derived from human populations where BI as an institution has been applied?
Issues needing further attention:
In order to finance BI sustainably a tax-based approach should be implemented progressively on income rate, rent or ownership, natural resource use, and consumption.
Is a basic income preferred to a guaranteed-job-offer? Should local currencies, or product-specific vouchers play an important role in the making-up of a basic income-rent?
How to implement BI at a political level; in particular taking into account voter participation in political processes.
What are the links between a society of employment and a society addicted to consumption?
Income Ceiling
IC is on the political agenda in Europe now.
Measures to redistribute income & wealth and measures to give equal access to environmental services are compatible and, in fact, they should go together.
Proposals on IC:
Minimum-maximum ratio
Ratio within companies
New ways on attaining social status (in the absence of high incomes) should be found
Social Metabolism and transitions
Socio-Political aspects
Link environmental movements with social movements and focus on underlying root causes to form alliances.
Aim at the consumption level of the sustainable peoples/classes of the world though this consumption levels take place in an unsustainable systems and therefore cultural changes are necessary even among within these peoples.
Create autonomous and intentional communities (niches of sustainability), and connect them. Promote this way of living and intervene in the system.
We need to change the current narratives that focus on material wealth to shift the focus on values that acknowledge the sustainability principles.
Bio-physical sphere
Global level
Closing material cycles as much as possible
Reinforce the product design-reduce its material requirements-make it more re-usable and re-cyclable.
Reduce, eliminate toxic chemicals (industrial fertilizers)
Return to the traditional, innovative way of agriculture-agro-ecology
Reduce the global throughput of energy and materials adjusting it to the carrying capacity of the biosphere
Put a limit to human appropriation of net primary production. Limit deforestation, change in industrial agriculture
Internalize real costs
Local and regional levels
Not exporting trash
Reduce long-distance imports
Less energy consumption in inputs
Switching to locally produced renewable energy
Construct with regional materials
Bio-climatic architectural design
Use seasonal, ecological and local food
Re-ruralisation
Foster proximity relationships through urban redesign-re-organization
Reduce the transport infra-structure and make it more collective
Promote sharing of electronic home equipment. Perceive them as commons
Which social changes we expect with bio-physical decrease?
Demographic
Human time
Fool sovereignty
Immigration
Gender issues
- 1800 reads