01934nas a2200109   4500008004100000245009100041210006900132260001200201520152200213100002001735856006901755       2014                        eng d00aBeyond extractivism: Debates and Practices around Post-Extractivism  in Latin America0 aBeyond extractivism Debates and Practices around PostExtractivis  aLeipzig3 aSpecial Session: Beyond extractivism: Debates and Practices around Post-Extractivism  in Latin America Organizer and Chair: Dr. Kristina Dietz Key words: extractivism, neocolonialism, redistribution, ecological costs Summary: Extractivism is a mode of accumulation that started more than 500 years ago. In Latin America, it has transited from its colonial form through a neoliberal form to the actual mainly post-neoliberal form, which includes a limited redistribution of the benefits obtained by the State from exploitation and exportation of resources. This actual modality, implemented in most South American countries, is called neo-extractivism. The State plays a more important role, and poverty is slightly reduced in numbers, but the subordination of the economies to the dynamics of the world market and thus their vulnerability persists – reinforcing neo-colonial relationships at the international level. There are no structural reforms in order to deepen redistribution of wealth. The existing institutions are not able to cope with the ecological and social costs that are generated by the extractivist activities. The path to exit extractivism with its political and economical, social and ecological consequences definitely must imply the planned degrowth of extractivist activities and its substitution by alternative economical activities. But this change may only be possible in terms of a global shift towards a new universal logic which aims at maintaining the conditions for humanity to live.1 aAcosta, Alberto  uhttps://degrowth.community/conference2014/scientific-papers/379101809nas a2200109   4500008004100000245007100041210006700112260001200179520141900191100002001610856006901630       2014                        eng d00aPost-Extracivism and De-Growth: Two Sides of the Same Perspective?0 aPostExtracivism and DeGrowth Two Sides of the Same Perspective  aLeipzig3 aSpecial Session: Post-Extracivism and De-Growth: Two Sides of the Same Perspective? Organizer and Chair: Dr. Karin Gabbert, Rosa Luxemburg Foundation Key words: growth, extractivism, economy, nature, sustainability Summary: Imagining an economy beyond growth is one of the great challenges of our times, to prevent a social and environmental debacle which could threaten humanity itself. There is a correspondence between debates on degrowth in the global north and postextractivism in the global south, as the sustainability limits of the planet are being reached. Nonetheless, the issue of inequality cannot be ignored in these debates. IN the global South, growth must be differentiated into “good and bad growth”, as Manfred Max Neef states, taking into account real social needs. The global South must seek sustainable life options that are not a mere caricaturesque copy of western/northern lifestyle. As important steps in this direction, Nature must be de-commodified and economy subordinated to ecology. Economy must be rethought giving back to production its material significance and breaking with the epistemology of mere value. Extractivism follows the logic of growth which is part of the “genetic code” of today’s economic system, programmed to grow or die, as Enrique Leff says. It is not only promoted by neoliberal political forces in Latin America, but also by progressive governments.1 aAcosta, Alberto  uhttps://degrowth.community/conference2014/scientific-papers/3792